Recognition and facial image comparison are distinctly different exercises. However, if recognition is based on imagery evidence it is important for the Court to understand to what extent the imagery can be considered to reliably present facial features.
Clothing comparison / Vehicle comparison / Weapon comparison / Object comparison/analysis
- Within recorded imagery there can be an almost limitless number of objects of interest. By applying fundamental imagery analysis principles the relative size, tone and form of questioned objects can be analysed in order to either assess the nature of a certain object or to compare it with a known object. Whilst casework typically involves the consideration of items such as clothing, vehicles, weapons and tattoos, a more unusual case involved a fish comparison relating to the theft of valuable carp!
Chronological/Event analysis - In a crowded or busy scene the question of "what happened?"
may not be readily apparent to a jury. In order to assess the actions and dynamic activity within a scene a detailed frame-by-frame analysis is carried out that provides a commentary on the sequence of events.
Critique - In a criminal or civil case the opposing side may commission their own expert report. In order to apply the principle of Equality of Arms it is important for any such report to be properly scrutinised and, if necessary, challenged. A critique will consider such aspects as the training and experience of the author, the methodologies employed in the analysis, the potential for cognitive bias, whether best practice has been applied and whether any conclusions are properly supported by the available imagery evidence.
Boundary Disputes/Land Use analysis - Property disputes may involve the determination of boundaries, right of access or perhaps land use over a period of time. Depending on the particulars of the case, archive aerial imagery or Commercial Satellite Imagery can provide a valuable historical record of physical changes and activity.